Farmers gutted after compulsory acquisition amendment passes: VFF

Australian Rural & Regional News reminds readers that a media release is a statement of the author given. Media releases vary widely in reliability and may contain a combination of fact, aspirational statements, opinion, political commentary and even error. Especially on contentious issues, we suggest our readers read widely and assess the statements made by different parties and form their own view.

Recent stories

This story is open for comment below.  Be involved, share your views. 

Brett Hosking, VFF President, Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF), Media Release, 5 March 2026, 3.58pm

“The Victorian Farmers Federation is gutted that Parliament has backed laws allowing farmers’ land to be taken for transmission lines before the environmental assessment is even finished.”

“This will pour fuel on the anxiety and uncertainty already gripping communities at the heart of the energy transition.”

“Families now face the shadow of compulsory acquisition hanging over them while they are still trying to understand what a project means for their homes and livelihoods, as well as provide comprehensive information to the EES process.”

“It tells us that those in charge don’t genuinely understand the sentiment on the ground. It sends a clear and devastating message to regional Victoria that getting towers in the ground matters more than delivering a robust Environmental Effects Statement and treating people with dignity.”

“We thank the members of Parliament who questioned and opposed this change on behalf of regional communities.”

Farmers shocked by last-minute transmission land-grab bid: VFF

Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF), Media Release, 5 March 2026, 5.30am

The Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) is calling on the State Parliament to reject a last minute government amendment that would green-light power companies to compulsorily acquire farmers’ land for transmission lines before environmental and planning approvals are even finished. 

The proposed amendment to the Energy and Other Legislation Amendment (Resilience Reforms and Other Matters) Bill 2026 creates a direct bypass around the state’s environmental protection laws. It explicitly allows the government to force through transmission easements while an Environment Effects Statement (EES) is still underway.

VFF President Brett Hosking said the move was a betrayal of trust and due process.

“This amendment is a sneak attack being jammed through at the eleventh hour with zero transparency or consultation with the farmers whose livelihoods are on the line.” 

“It would allow the Minister to bypass Victoria’s environment and planning laws, and potentially waste millions of taxpayer dollars in the process.” 

“What is the actual point of asking for the community’s feedback, while at the exact same you are compulsory acquiring their land behind the scenes? That’s a complete slap in the face and will only alienate these communities further.” 

“You don’t build the roof before you pour the slab, and you certainly don’t compulsorily acquire a farmer’s land before you’ve even finished the independent assessment proving the powerline is safe, necessary, and in the right spot.”

Mr Hosking warned the amendment would damage perceptions of the EES process and strengthen the hand of power companies which are already treating communities with contempt.

“Make no mistake, this is about fast-tracking intimidation of landholders. It gives proponents the power to walk onto a farm and say, ‘sign this substandard agreement today, or the government will just take your land tomorrow’– before landholders have even seen the details of a project, let alone an approval,” he said.

The VFF also highlighted the reckless financial risk to Victorian taxpayers.

“If the EES process does its job and forces a route change – or if a project simply falls over – the state will have forced taxpayers to fork out millions in compensation for easements that are completely useless,” Mr Hosking said.

The VFF is calling on Members of the Legislative Council oppose the amendment and stand up for basic fairness.

“Our message to the Parliament is simple: you assess the environmental impact first and do it by the book before you do anything else. Do not treat regional communities with this kind of contempt,” Mr Hosking said.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

KEEP IN TOUCH

Sign up for updates from Australian Rural & Regional News

Manage your subscription

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Subscribe for notice of every post

If you are really keen and would like an email about every post from ARR.News as soon as it is published, sign up here:

Email me posts ?

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Share your views

Australian Rural & Regional News is opening media releases for comment to encourage healthy discussion and debate on issues relevant to our readers and to rural and regional Australia. Defamatory, unlawful, offensive or inappropriate comments will not be allowed.

Leave a Reply