Statement on EPBC determination: Gippsland Critical Minerals

Australian Rural & Regional News reminds readers that a media release is a statement of the author given. Media releases vary widely in reliability and may contain a combination of fact, aspirational statements, opinion, political commentary and even error. Especially on contentious issues, we suggest our readers read widely and assess the statements made by different parties and form their own view.

Recent stories

This story is open for comment below.  Be involved, share your views. 

Gippsland Critical Minerals (GCM), Media Release, 15 May 2026

Gippsland Critical Minerals (GCM) welcomes today’s determination by the Commonwealth on the Fingerboards Project under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act).

GCM screenshot
Screenshot: GCM website.

The Commonwealth has confirmed four controlling provisions, with GCM’s environmental and technical studies already underway in response to each:

  • Ramsar wetlands (sections 16 and 17B): Surface Water and Water Acquisition studies
  • Listed threatened species and communities (sections 18 and 18A): Ecology study
  • Listed migratory species (sections 20 and 20A): Ecology study
  • Nuclear actions (sections 21 and 22A): Radiation Impact study

The determination is standard and in line with GCM expectations. As such, GCM has already commenced studies in these areas as part of the state (EES) process. It is consistent with EPBC determinations for all other minerals sands projects in Australia, including Donald and VHM.

About the nuclear action trigger and the EPBC

  • Reforms passed to the EPBC Act in late 2025, which come into effect in July 2026, introduce a new ‘radiological exposure action’ framework, expressly excluding mineral sands operations. 
  • However, the current EPBC Act applies a technical threshold for nuclear action: 1 becquerel per gram (Bq/g), a very low level. For example, a single banana has about 0.1 Bp/g of radioactivity, which averages to roughly 12 to 15 Bq in total per whole banana.
  • Currently – If naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) is present above this threshold in one part of a project, the project in entirety is captured under that provision. 
  • At Fingerboards, that threshold is reached only within the enclosed heavy mineral concentrate storage shed, while the material itself remains below that level throughout the project.

GCM referred the Fingerboards Project at the earliest opportunity to align with EES studies, meaning today’s determination has been made under the current legislative framework. 

Controlled actions under the EPBC Act are subject to the Commonwealth’s most rigorous environmental assessment framework. Projects that cannot demonstrate they can operate safely and meet the required environmental standards are not approved. 

To view the EPBC determination visit epbcpublicportal.environment.gov.au/all-referrals and to view details on GCM studies visit gippslandcriticalminerals.com/environment/monitoring-studies.

Find the series of stories relating to the Fingerboards Project including statements by Gippsland Critical Minerals and the community action group opposing the project, Mine Free Glenaladale here: Fingerboards Mineral Sands

, , , , ,

KEEP IN TOUCH

Sign up for updates from Australian Rural & Regional News

Manage your subscription

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Subscribe for notice of every post

If you are really keen and would like an email about every post from ARR.News as soon as it is published, sign up here:

Email me posts ?

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Share your views

Australian Rural & Regional News is opening media releases for comment to encourage healthy discussion and debate on issues relevant to our readers and to rural and regional Australia. Defamatory, unlawful, offensive or inappropriate comments will not be allowed.

Leave a Reply