Wednesday, November 19, 2025

Moo-ving the boundaries: New research evaluates virtual fences for use on NT cattle stations

Australian Rural & Regional News reminds readers that a media release is a statement of the author given. Media releases vary widely in reliability and may contain a combination of fact, aspirational statements, opinion, political commentary and even error. Especially on contentious issues, we suggest our readers read widely and assess the statements made by different parties and form their own view.

Recent stories

This story is open for comment below.  Be involved, share your views. 

Charles Darwin University (CDU), Media Release, 19 November 2025

Cattle producers in Northern Australia face unique challenges when adapting tools like virtual fences on their properties, but new research from Charles Darwin University (CDU) is set to break down the barriers to this technology.

Virtual fences remotely map and control livestock such as cows by fitting the animal with a GPS collar that delivers audio cues and electric pulses to the animal if they approach a pre-set boundary.  

CDU Associate Professor Beth Penrose said the technology would be invaluable to northern beef producers who oversee millions of hectares of land in environments prone to fire and flooding.  

Associate Professor Penrose said virtual fences wouldn’t just boost farmers’ productivity but would also benefit the environment.

“One of the main types of landscape that we want to protect is riparian areas – areas around water,” she said.

“The watercourses often flood during the wet season and then recede, so if you wanted to fence the watercourse with a normal fence, this would wash away and you would need to replace it, which takes a lot of time and money.

“Permanently fencing off watercourses could make the riparian areas fire corridors, whereas virtual fencing allows native herbivores such as kangaroos to keep eating the vegetation to keep the fuel load low.”

Virtual fences are heavily relied upon in southern states, where calves are separated from cows earlier, but northern beef producers typically operate using cow-calf systems, keeping the pair together much longer.  

CDU Professor Sunil Kadri said the collars used in virtual fence technology were not considered suitable for calves, which poses a unique challenge for Territory farmers.

“We don’t know whether the calves will respect the virtual fence, whether mothers will ignore the fence if their calves are on the other side of it, and what the implications of this are for welfare and behaviour,” Professor Kadri said.

“It is important we develop an understanding of the implications of using virtual fences in northern rangelands, for the behaviour and welfare of calves and cows, as well the potential for using the technology across a number of applications within this environment.” 

, , , , , , , ,

KEEP IN TOUCH

Sign up for updates from Australian Rural & Regional News

Manage your subscription

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Subscribe for notice of every post

If you are really keen and would like an email about every post from ARR.News as soon as it is published, sign up here:

Email me posts ?

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Share your views

Australian Rural & Regional News is opening media releases for comment to encourage healthy discussion and debate on issues relevant to our readers and to rural and regional Australia. Defamatory, unlawful, offensive or inappropriate comments will not be allowed.

Leave a Reply