Tasmanian landholders reject last-minute Government offer on transmission corridor: TasFarmers

Australian Rural & Regional News reminds readers that a media release is a statement of the author given. Media releases vary widely in reliability and may contain a combination of fact, aspirational statements, opinion, political commentary and even error. Especially on contentious issues, we suggest our readers read widely and assess the statements made by different parties and form their own view.

Recent stories

This story is open for comment below.  Be involved, share your views. 

TasFarmers, Media Release, 30 June 2025

Landowners along the Tasmanian North West Transmission Development have overwhelmingly rejected a last-minute strategic benefit payment offer made by the Tasmanian Government.

TasFarmers CEO Nathan Calman said the offer delivered at the eleventh hour through TasNetworks broke pre-election commitments made to negotiate in good faith.

“We’ve had concerns for months that the government hasn’t been acting in good faith,” Mr Calman said.

“Now, just before an election, they’ve left landholders feeling forced to accept an offer unilaterally imposed, without proper consultation or process.

Following a landholder meeting in Sheffield, Mr Calman said the message was clear: frustration, disappointment and distrust.

“Farmers are describing this as a breach of trust. Commitments made before the last election have not been honoured. People feel shut out of the process, ignored and the social licence for this project is now at serious risk,” said Mr Calman. 

Mr Calman said that social licence is essential for delivering major infrastructure in rural areas.

“It’s about recognising the people who host these projects as part of the broader opportunity. When it’s done poorly, as we’ve seen in Victoria, projects take decades longer and cost more, both for consumers and landholders.”

TasFarmers also warned against adopting punitive measures seen interstate.

“The last thing we want is a scenario where Tasmanian landholders who lock their gates are fined for simply asserting their frustrations about not being consulted. That approach erodes trust and delays progress,” Mr Calman said.

With a state election approaching, Mr Calman called on all major parties to step up.

“Rather than suppressing debate, candidates should engage directly with those affected. This project, if it proceeds, will shape Tasmania for the next 60 to 100 years. We can’t afford to get it wrong.”

Mr Calman also raised that the election period should not delay the release of the whole-of-state business case for Project Marinus.

“There’s real concern that the business case, which the government committed to publish by 1 July, will be quietly delayed until after the election, shutting down public scrutiny when it matters most.”

“Political convenience must not override transparency or respect for those most impacted, ” Mr Calman said.

, , , , , , , , ,

KEEP IN TOUCH

Sign up for updates from Australian Rural & Regional News

Manage your subscription

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Subscribe for notice of every post

If you are really keen and would like an email about every post from ARR.News as soon as it is published, sign up here:

Email me posts ?

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Share your views

Australian Rural & Regional News is opening media releases for comment to encourage healthy discussion and debate on issues relevant to our readers and to rural and regional Australia. Defamatory, unlawful, offensive or inappropriate comments will not be allowed.

Leave a Reply